The "federated" service that isn't federated.
-
The "federated" service that isn't federated. Which is owned by one company.
(I know folks like it, hi all of you through the bridge... but it is not owned by the people, it is owned by one single company).
-
The "federated" service that isn't federated. Which is owned by one company.
(I know folks like it, hi all of you through the bridge... but it is not owned by the people, it is owned by one single company).
-
-
Right. That's kind of the point! The proto-fediverse was dominated by a VC-funded startup -- just like today's ATmosphere. And eight to ten years later the next-generaiton protocols (originally also developed by a corporation) got refined and adopted by a standards bodies -- just like will probably happen with AT Proto.
And presumably just as somebody from a Meta-funded non-profit has repeatedly shut down criticisms of Meta on the W3C ActivityPub mailing list, at some point somebody from a Bluesky-funded non-profit will try to shut down criticisms of Bluesky on whatever standards group is trying to take things forward.
There's a lot to critique with Bluesky but many of the critques apply to the ActivityPub fediverse as well.
-
T thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange shared this topic